RNSurveyRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026

Labor and birth care practices associated with exclusive breastfeeding at discharge.

Manuela Beatriz Velho, Isabel Cristina Alves Maliska, Zannis Benevides de Andrade and 5 others

PMID 42788535

WHAT IT FOUND

In 756 women, 85.0% were exclusively breastfeeding at discharge; privacy, skin-to-skin contact, feeding cue guidance, and positioning help were associated with higher rates, while cesarean birth and invasive procedures were associated with lower rates.

Key findings

01Of 756 women, 643 were exclusively breastfeeding at discharge, a prevalence of 85.0%.

02Privacy and a welcoming environment (87.3% vs 78.7%), skin-to-skin contact (87.1% vs 74.8%), recognition of feeding cues (88.6% vs 81.4%), and positioning assistance (88.4% vs 72.8%) were associated with higher exclusive breastfeeding at discharge.

03Cesarean birth (80.9% vs 87.4%) and undergoing at least one invasive procedure (83.7% vs 90.1%) were associated with lower exclusive breastfeeding at discharge.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 30.8% of eligible women and 24.5% of all women cared for during the same period responded, so the sample was self-selected and may not represent the wider maternity population. Data were self-reported after birth and reflected participants' perceptions of the care they received, so information and recall bias are possible. The questionnaire was electronic, which may have excluded women with limited internet access. No sociodemographic data or data on clinical and obstetric complications were collected, so associations could not be adjusted for potential confounders. The study was conducted in one Baby-Friendly hospital in southern Brazil during the pandemic, so the findings may not apply to other settings. Many labor, birth, and breastfeeding-support practices occurred together, so the contribution of any single practice cannot be separated.

Declared interests

No external funding was received. The study was carried out with support from the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel - Brazil (CAPES), Financing Code 001.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the higher exclusive breastfeeding rates as proof that privacy, skin-to-skin contact, feeding cue guidance, or positioning assistance caused exclusive breastfeeding. The study was cross-sectional, used a self-selected online questionnaire, and did not adjust for sociodemographic or obstetric factors, so it can only report associations. Many practices occurred together, so the contribution of any single practice cannot be separated.

Read it on PubMed →