RNSystematic ReviewNursing open2023

Involvement, topics, and roles of nurses in shared decision-making with patients with dementia in acute hospitals: An integrative review.

Annette Keuning-Plantinga, Josephine Stoffels, Petrie F Roodbol and 2 others

PMID 36700922

WHAT IT FOUND

Nurses in acute hospitals helped shape decisions for people with dementia about feeding, pain, discharge and palliative care.

They gathered information, adapted communication and linked families to clinicians. The review found little evidence about what this changes for patients.

Key findings

01Nurses participated as team members or intermediaries in shared decision-making.

02Some studies described nurses mainly supporting patients in decision-making.

03Only nine studies were included, and none explicitly focused on nurses' roles in shared decision-making with dementia in acute hospitals.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only nine studies were included, and eight were qualitative, so the review describes processes rather than measuring patient outcomes. The included studies had different aims, populations and settings, so the findings are heterogeneous. None of the included studies explicitly focused on nurses' roles in shared decision-making with dementia in acute hospitals. The review could not show how dementia or cognition affects patients' ability to participate in decisions. Only one randomized controlled trial was found, and the authors note possible publication bias. The analysis used Groen's model, which was developed for dementia networks, not acute hospitals.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this review as proof that involving nurses improves shared decision-making or patient outcomes. It maps roles and topics from mostly qualitative studies, and the authors say there is too little direct evidence to judge benefit.

Read it on PubMed →