Interventions for improving treatment adherence in young people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): A systematic review of behaviour change theory and behaviour change techniques.
Cassandra Screti, Lou Atkinson, Rachel Shaw and 2 others
PMID 39704083WHAT IT FOUND
Medication adherence improvements in adolescents with IBD were inconsistent: family programmes sometimes helped, often only in small subgroups, and no intervention reported using behaviour change theory.
Key findings
01Seven interventions involving 217 young people with IBD were included; five were evaluated as randomised controlled trials.
02Family-based programmes produced inconsistent medication adherence effects: a telephone-delivered programme did not improve adherence overall, while a face-to-face programme improved adherence only for participants prescribed immunosuppressants.
03No included intervention reported using behaviour change theory, and action planning, feedback on behaviour, and adding objects to the environment were seen only in interventions that improved adherence.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only seven interventions and 217 young people were included, with sample sizes ranging from 9 to 76, so the review is small and heterogeneous. Meta-analysis was not possible because of sample size and heterogeneity, so findings were synthesised narratively. Significant adherence effects were often subgroup-only, and some studies were not sufficiently powered for subgroup analyses. Outcome assessors were not blinded in the randomised trials. Intervention content, participant characteristics, parent involvement, ethnicity, prescribed medications and statistical details were poorly reported. No included intervention reported using behaviour change theory, and interventions were not described using the behaviour change technique taxonomy. The interventions addressed oral medication adherence only, not non-oral medications or lifestyle recommendations. Six of seven interventions were conducted in the USA, mainly by the same research team, limiting generalisability. Because interventions contained multiple components, the contribution of any single component cannot be separated.
Declared interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest. The work was funded by Crohn's and Colitis UK and Aston University, with funding awarded to Dr Gemma Heath.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that family-based programmes or specific techniques reliably improve medication taking for all adolescents with IBD. Benefits were inconsistent, often limited to small subgroups or specific medications, and because interventions included multiple components, the contribution of any single component cannot be separated.