Inter- and intra-rater reliability of a technique assessing the length of the Latissimus Dorsi muscle.
Muhammad Dawood, Piet J Bekker, Agatha J van Rooijen and 1 others
PMID 30135913WHAT IT FOUND
The shoulder muscle length test showed poor to moderate agreement between raters and repeated readings in healthy physiotherapy students.
Do not rely on it as an objective measure yet.
Key findings
01Repeated readings by the same rater showed moderate agreement, but agreement between different raters was low.
02The agreement intervals were too wide for the readings to be considered equivalent.
03Novice raters recorded lower first readings than experienced raters.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study was done in healthy physiotherapy students with no current shoulder pain or pathology, so it does not show how the test performs in patients with shoulder problems or after breast cancer treatment. Of 74 volunteers, 56 were analysed; exclusions were shoulder pain or pathology and inability to maintain a flat back, which may limit generalisability. The inclusion criteria stated ages 18 to 25 years, but the results reported ages 18 to 28 years. The text reported inter-rater agreement as 0.48, but the table reported 0.33 across all four stations. The measurements were taken in a physiotherapy gymnasium with multiple stations, and participants could observe each other, which may have affected consistency. All raters said the goniometer was difficult to read to the nearest single digit. Scapular stabilisation was not standardised because the size and placement of the raters' hands varied across stations. The pelvic strap limited tilting, but some participants could still change lumbar lordosis inconsistently. Each participant was measured eight times within less than 4 hours, which may have introduced stretch, learning, or fatigue effects. Novice raters measured lower values than experienced raters, so rater experience may affect readings.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as proof that the test can diagnose a short latissimus dorsi. It only measured agreement in healthy students, and agreement was poor to moderate.