RNCohortJournal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society2016

Innovative Use of Existing Public and Private Data Sources for Postmarketing Surveillance of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections Associated With Intravenous Needleless Connectors.

Ying P Tabak, Richard S Johannes, Xiaowu Sun and 2 others

PMID 27598072

WHAT IT FOUND

Hospitals using a new needleless connector showed no significant difference in central line infection rates compared to those using other connectors.

The new device met statistical criteria for noninferiority, meaning it was not associated with higher infection risks.

Key findings

01The adjusted relative risk for central line-associated bloodstream infections in hospitals using the study needleless connector was 0.94 compared to comparator hospitals, which was not statistically significant.

02The upper limit of the confidence interval for the relative risk was below the noninferiority margin of 1.23, meeting the statistical criterion for noninferiority.

03Sensitivity analyses restricted to hospitals with high-frequency or high-volume use of the study connector produced results consistent with the overall finding of no significant difference.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study relied on hospital-level data rather than patient-level data, so it could not fully adjust for individual patient risk factors. Researchers did not have access to data on which specific connectors comparator hospitals used, only that they did not use the study device. The study could not confirm if hospitals used the study connector exclusively or mixed it with other devices, though sensitivity analyses suggested this did not change the results.

Declared interests

Several authors were employed by CareFusion, the manufacturer of the study device. One author served as an unpaid consultant and coauthor.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the noninferiority result as proof that the new connector reduces infection rates. The study only demonstrated that it did not increase them compared to existing devices.

Read it on PubMed →