Innovative education for adolescent mothers in neonatal care: practices in nursing training.
Maria Cecília Bandeira Arnaud Moura, Ana Maria Cavalcante Melo, Pedro Henrique do Nascimento Silva and 1 others
PMID 42113799WHAT IT FOUND
Adolescent mothers and nursing students described newborn-care workshops using dolls, simulations, and feedback as increasing maternal confidence and student empathy.
These are reported experiences, not evidence that the programme improves discharge outcomes.
Key findings
01Analysis produced four themes: reflective practice, playful and humanized teaching strategies, improved nursing practice, and maternal empowerment through feedback.
02Nursing students described adapting education for adolescent mothers by using visual aids and clinical simulations when low education and socioeconomic conditions made standard teaching difficult.
03The intervention was described as providing a supportive learning space that eliminated insecurity and increased teenage mothers' self-confidence.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study was done in one neonatal unit, so its findings may not transfer to other settings. It included only 3 nursing students and 4 adolescent mothers, a very small sample. Interventions were delivered by undergraduate students, and researchers' ties to the unit may have made experiences seem more positive. The short internship may have limited continuity and follow-up of mothers' learning. Only female nursing students took part, reflecting the course's gender mix, so male students' experiences were not represented.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the reported confidence and skill gains as proof that this programme works. The study is a small qualitative action-research report from one neonatal unit, with 3 nursing students and 4 adolescent mothers, and it describes participants' experiences rather than measured patient outcomes.