Influence of Social Support on Patients' Adherence to Activity Advice in Low Back Pain: A Double-Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial.
Ben van Koppen, Pim Zandwijk, Henk van Mameren and 2 others
PMID 41224522WHAT IT FOUND
Partner or friend social support added to guideline physiotherapy and activity advice did not improve adherence for inactive people with recurrent low back pain.
One week 12 looser definition showed a difference, but the main outcome showed no difference.
Key findings
01Partner or friend social support added to guideline physiotherapy and activity advice did not increase adherence compared with control.
02At week 12, a looser adherence definition found more adherent patients in the intervention group than in the control group.
03The intervention group had higher average walking time and standing time than the control group, while other measured activities did not differ.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study included fewer patients than the sample size calculation required. Twenty-one patients terminated participation, and some questionnaires and activity monitor files were missing or unreadable. Twenty-one patients were not able to find a partner or friend, which the authors describe as selection bias. Data collection took a long time and was interrupted by COVID-19 lockdowns and practice restrictions. Because both groups were treated in the same practices, patients and therapists may have exchanged information about the interventions. The activity monitor could not distinguish lying down from not wearing the device. The social support questionnaire was developed for this study and was not validated. Patients could not help design the activity advice, so it may not fit their preferences. Only physically inactive patients were included, so the result may not apply to more active patients. The activity advice may have been too intensive for the inactive patients included.
Declared interests
The authors report no funding interests and no conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that partner or friend social support reliably improves adherence. The strict primary adherence outcome showed no difference between groups, and the week 12 result used a looser definition and was not the main outcome.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →