SLPOtherInternational journal of audiology2021

Influence of aided audibility on speech recognition performance with frequency composition for children and adults.

Marc A Brennan, Jenna M Browning, Meredith Spratford and 2 others

PMID 33719807

WHAT IT FOUND

Frequency composition did not improve speech recognition in noise for children or adults overall.

Only children with very low aided audibility showed a specific benefit for single words, but this did not extend to sentences or adults.

Key findings

01The overall effect of frequency composition on speech recognition was not statistically significant.

02Children with lower aided speech intelligibility showed a significant correlation between better word recognition and frequency composition use.

03The benefit observed in children for single words did not generalize to sentence recognition or to adult participants.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study used a hearing-aid simulator rather than actual hearing aids, which may not fully replicate real-world listening conditions. The sample size was small (38 participants), limiting the power to detect subtle effects or generalize findings. Results were mixed, with significant benefits only seen in a specific subgroup (children with low audibility) for one stimulus type (words), requiring cautious interpretation. One participant was excluded due to a data collection error, reducing the final analyzed sample.

Declared interests

The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health. The authors declared no other conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the significant correlation in children with low audibility as evidence that frequency composition is an effective treatment for hearing loss in general. The primary outcome for the whole group was null, and the benefit did not extend to sentence recognition or adults.

Read it on PubMed →