RNRCTJournal of psychiatric and mental health nursing2025

Impact of Collaborative Nursing Care on Health Outcomes of Mental Health Day Hospital Users: A Mixed Methods Study.

Ana Ventosa-Ruiz, Antonio R Moreno-Poyato, Cristina Cañete-Massé and 4 others

PMID 39526836

WHAT IT FOUND

Users in the nurse-led collaborative care group improved more than control on later recovery stages, positive mental health and the nurse-user relationship.

Early recovery stage did not change, so the benefit was not uniform.

Key findings

01For the primary recovery-stage outcome, each stage score ranges from 0 to 50. Moratorium did not change significantly, and Awareness did not differ by group, but Preparation, Rebuilding and Growth improved more in the intervention group: Preparation 23.175 to 29.512 versus control 26.813 to 27.250; Rebuilding 22.250 to 29.337 versus control 26.984 to 27.844; Growth 18.250 to 27.875 versus control 22.172 to 23.938.

02The total therapeutic relationship score, on a 12 to 84 scale where higher is better, rose from 57.112 to 67.563 in intervention and 67.016 to 68.578 in control. Total positive mental health rose from 95.313 to 115.550 in intervention and 101.484 to 102.859 in control.

03At baseline, control had a higher total therapeutic relationship score (67.016 versus 57.112) and higher scores in some recovery stages.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The groups were assigned by hospital rather than randomly, so the intervention and control groups may differ in ways that affect outcomes. Baseline scores were not equal: control had a higher total therapeutic relationship score and higher scores in some recovery stages. The follow-up table lists 60 control participants, while the text reports 64 control participants and says none withdrew. The sample was relatively small and limited to three day hospitals in one region, so results may not generalise. Participants had varied mental health diagnoses, which adds variability. The intervention was a bundle of nurse-led interviews, focus groups and many co-designed group activities delivered alongside usual day hospital care; the paper cannot separate the contribution of any single component. The primary recovery outcome was mixed: no significant change in Moratorium and no group difference in Awareness.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that nurse-led collaborative care alone caused the improvements. The study was not randomised, the control group started with better therapeutic relationship and some recovery stage scores, and the intervention was given together with usual day hospital care and many co-designed activities.

Read it on PubMed →