Impact of age on acute post-TBI neuropathology in mice expressing humanized tau: a Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium Study.
Benoit Mouzon, Nicole Saltiel, Scott Ferguson and 11 others
PMID 29927671WHAT IT FOUND
Older mice showed more support-cell scarring and tau changes after repeated mild head injuries, while younger mice showed more brain immune-cell activation and axonal injury.
This is mouse pathology, not a therapy result.
Key findings
01GFAP astrocyte staining and Iba-1 microglial staining in the corpus callosum showed injury-dependent differences across age and sex groups.
02APP-positive axonal injury profiles appeared in the corpus callosum after repeated injury in young and aged mice but not in sham mice, and the largest difference was between young and aged injured mice.
03Twenty-four hours after the last procedure, hippocampal RZ3 phosphorylated tau staining was higher after mild head injury than in sham controls in male mice, aged mice, young mice, and overall mice.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they found
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study was done in mice, not people, so it does not show how human patients recover from mild head injury. The mice were genetically modified to express human tau, and the authors note this line already develops early tau pathology at 3 months and tangles at 9 months, so results may not reflect wild-type animals. Aged mice were 12 to 13 months old, which the authors say is not representative of clinical studies of people aged 65 years or older. Only 24 hours after the last injury was examined, so it cannot show what happens at later time points or whether the changes are repair or ongoing damage. The design used five injuries, so it cannot determine whether pathology came from the first or last injury. APP staining captures only a subpopulation of injured axons, so the full extent of axonal injury is not known. Some analyses used subsets of the assigned mice, and the paper says other brains were stored for future analyses. The paper measured only brain tissue staining, not patient function or treatment response.
Declared interests
The supplied metadata lists research support from the N.I.H., non-U.S. government, and U.S. government non-P.H.S. The article text does not include an author conflict-of-interest declaration.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read these mouse brain-stain differences as evidence that age or sex changes human recovery after concussion. The study used genetically modified mice, examined tissue only 24 hours after repeated injuries, and measured no patient function or treatment outcome.