RNSurveyInternational journal of nursing sciences2025

Identifying the key influencing factors of psychological birth trauma in primiparous women with interpretable machine learning.

Yuze Wu, Fengling Li, Huilan Shu and 5 others

PMID 40529457

WHAT IT FOUND

Pain scores above 6 and anxiety scores above 2 were linked to more psychological birth trauma in first-time mothers.

Resilience scores above 20 were linked to less trauma.

Key findings

01The best model identified intrapartum pain, anxiety, postpartum pain, resilience, and planned pregnancy as the most important factors.

02Intrapartum and postpartum pain were associated with higher psychological birth trauma scores.

03Higher resilience was associated with lower psychological birth trauma scores.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The design was cross-sectional, so it cannot show that pain, anxiety, resilience, or planned pregnancy caused psychological birth trauma. The sample was convenience-sampled first-time mothers from four hospitals in Sichuan, China. This restricts generalizability. Participants were only aged 18 to 40. The direction for planned pregnancy was inconsistent. The correlation analysis reported a positive association with trauma, while the SHAP analysis reported lower risk with planned pregnancy. The Childbirth Trauma Index had not previously been used or tested in Chinese primiparous women.

Declared interests

Funded by the Sichuan Province Nursing Scientific Research Project Plan and the 2022 Municipal-University Science and Technology Strategic Cooperation Special Fund of Nanchong Science and Technology Bureau. The authors declared no conflict of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat pain above 6 or anxiety above 2 as proven causes of birth trauma. The study is cross-sectional and based on questionnaire data, so it shows associations and model patterns, not tested clinical effects.

Read it on PubMed →