SLPCase-ControlJournal of fluency disorders2021

Identifying developmental stuttering and associated comorbidities in electronic health records and creating a phenome risk classifier.

Dillon G Pruett, Douglas M Shaw, Hung-Hsin Chen and 5 others

PMID 33894541

WHAT IT FOUND

Stuttering cases were hard to find in hospital records, but notes plus review confirmed them and found more frequent diagnosis groups for speech, developmental, sleep, hearing, allergy, infection and neurological conditions.

Key findings

01A keyword search returned 14,080 records, text mining narrowed this to 1,567 high-likelihood records, and manual review confirmed 1,143 developmental stuttering cases.

02The comorbidity analysis found 38 enriched diagnosis groups, including speech and language disorder, pervasive developmental disorders, hearing loss, sleep disorders, and atopic conditions.

03In classifier testing, 97 of 116 patients labelled high-likelihood were confirmed stuttering cases.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study used hospital records, not school or private speech pathology files, so many people who stutter may be missing. The control group may include hidden stuttering cases, because speech problems can go unnoticed or unrecorded during medical visits. Enriched diagnosis groups are not confirmed clinical relationships. They can arise from broad billing codes, coding habits, or shared medical care. The study cannot show that stuttering causes any listed condition, or that any condition causes stuttering. A very conservative correction for many comparisons may have missed real associations, including anxiety and ADHD. The classifier estimate cannot be converted into exact sensitivity, specificity, or negative predictive value because true absence of stuttering in controls is uncertain. Race recording was done by a third party and was not uniform, so it may have introduced some bias.

Declared interests

The authors report no declarations of interest. The paper lists NIH and non-U.S. government research support.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the enriched diagnosis groups as proof that stuttering causes sleep, hearing, allergy, infection, neurological, or developmental conditions. The study only compared records from a hospital database, and the authors state that causality cannot be assumed.

Read it on PubMed →