OtherInternational journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation2026

How deep is your recovery? Rethinking true motor recovery versus compensation in neurorehabilitation.

Antonio Caronni, Maurizio Amadei, Viviana Rota, Michela Picardi

PMID 41877523

WHAT IT FOUND

This paper proposes a theoretical model to help clinicians distinguish true physiological recovery from behavioral compensation.

It offers no new clinical evidence or trial results, so it does not change current practice guidelines.

What this paper is

This is a conceptual paper proposing a theoretical model for distinguishing motor recovery from compensation across different levels of the nervous system. It does not report data from a clinical trial, systematic review, or observational study, so there are no findings to act on regarding patient outcomes.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat the proposed 'strata' model as validated evidence for choosing one therapy over another. The paper argues for assessing deeper physiological levels but does not provide data showing that doing so improves patient outcomes compared to standard functional assessments.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →


The study

Certainty of evidence
Low

Browse

    Cite

    Antonio Caronni, Maurizio Amadei, Viviana Rota, et al. How deep is your recovery? Rethinking true motor recovery versus compensation in neurorehabilitation. International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation. 2026.

    Read the original — we summarise, we never replace the paper.