RNSurveyThe Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care : JANAC2025

HIV Vulnerability Typologies Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Lesotho: A Population-Based, Cross-Sectional, Latent Class Analysis.

Cho-Hee Shrader, Straso Jovanovski, Suzue Saito and 3 others

PMID 39787328

WHAT IT FOUND

In Lesotho, within each age group from 15 to 29, the high-vulnerability group had higher HIV prevalence than low-vulnerability or parous groups.

The high-risk profile clustered several sexual behaviors, not one single risk.

Key findings

01HIV seropositivity increased with age: 4% of those aged 15–19 years, 13% of those aged 20–24 years, and 28% of those aged 25–29 years.

02Among those aged 15–19 years, the high-vulnerability class had higher odds of HIV seropositivity than the low-vulnerability class (odds ratio 3.54, 95% confidence interval 1.09–11.51).

03Among those aged 25–29 years, the high-vulnerability class had higher odds of HIV seropositivity than the parous class (odds ratio 3.73, 95% confidence interval 2.32–5.99).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study measured behaviors and HIV status at one time, so it cannot show that any behavior caused HIV or that class membership changes over time. The latent class models depended on the authors' choices among fit indices and subjective judgments about model parsimony, and a different model could have produced different associations. The analysis did not assess sexual or physical violence, which the paper notes are known factors for HIV acquisition. For ages 15–19, participants who reported never having sex were excluded from the latent class analysis, so the classes apply only to the remaining 566 in that age group. The label low-vulnerability is relative within each age group; in ages 20–24, the low-vulnerability group had 9.52% HIV prevalence, and in ages 25–29, the low-vulnerability and parous groups had 22.42% and 23.47% HIV prevalence.

Declared interests

The authors report no real or perceived vested interests related to this article.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the high-vulnerability class as proof that any single behavior causes HIV or that a targeted intervention works. This is a cross-sectional survey, and the paper reports associations between latent classes and HIV serostatus, not tested effects.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
3,464 adolescent girls and young women aged 15–29 years with valid HIV test results; latent class analysis groups were 566 aged 15–19, 1,237 aged 20–24, and 1,161 aged 25–29
Certainty of evidence
Low

More in paediatrics & neonatal

Browse

Cite

Cho-Hee Shrader, Straso Jovanovski, Suzue Saito, et al. HIV Vulnerability Typologies Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Lesotho: A Population-Based, Cross-Sectional, Latent Class Analysis. The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care : JANAC. 2025.

Read the original