RNMeta-AnalysisInternational journal of community based nursing and midwifery2017

Health Related Quality of Life in Iranian Elderly Citizens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mohammad Farajzadeh, Reza Ghanei Gheshlagh, Kourosh Sayehmiri

PMID 28409164

WHAT IT FOUND

Iranian older adults had an average SF-36 quality-of-life score of 53.2.

Healthy older adults scored higher than sick older adults, and scores did not improve with publication year.

Key findings

01Across 21 studies, 5318 older adults had an average SF-36 quality-of-life score of 53.2.

02Healthy older adults had a higher average SF-36 score (53.8) than sick older adults (50.6).

03Average quality-of-life scores did not change significantly with year of publication.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only studies using SF-36 were included, so the pooled score cannot be compared directly with studies using other quality-of-life tools. There was very high heterogeneity between studies (I2 99.8%), so the pooled average may not represent all older adults in Iran. The review could not separate different diseases because included studies varied, so it cannot say which condition lowers quality of life most. Many initial articles were excluded because they did not report separate quality-of-life scores for older adults or were not original studies, so the result rests on 21 articles. The included studies were conducted in Iran, so the scores may not apply to older adults in other countries.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the average score of 53.2, or the higher score in healthy older adults, as evidence that a care programme improves quality of life. The review pooled existing SF-36 scores and tested no treatment.

Read it on PubMed →