SLPCohortAmerican journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities2018

Growth and Decline in Language and Phonological Memory Over Two Years Among Adolescents With Down Syndrome.

Frances A Conners, Andrew S Tungate, Leonard Abbeduto and 2 others

PMID 29480772

WHAT IT FOUND

Over two years, adolescents with Down syndrome showed growth in receptive vocabulary, while grammar stayed stable.

Younger participants also showed gains in expressive vocabulary and digit memory, but nonword repetition declined.

Key findings

01Receptive vocabulary grew over 2 years, and the growth was consistent across the adolescent age range.

02Receptive and expressive grammar showed no significant change over 2 years.

03For phonological memory, nonword repetition declined over 2 years for the group as a whole, while digit memory did not change overall.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study followed participants for only two years, so small or nonlinear changes could have been missed. The sample was modest, and the analyses of individual reliable change were exploratory because standard errors had to be estimated with compromises. Eligibility required English speech, adequate vision and hearing, and no autism spectrum disorder, so the results do not necessarily apply to all adolescents with Down syndrome. There was no same-age comparison group with another intellectual disability, so the pattern cannot be said to be specific to Down syndrome. There was no treatment, control group, or random assignment, so the study describes change over time rather than effects of therapy.

Declared interests

The article is listed as supported by NIH extramural research funding. The supplied text does not include a separate conflict-of-interest declaration.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the improvements in the younger group as proof that therapy caused them. The study assigned no treatment and had no control group, and the full sample showed no significant change in expressive vocabulary or digit memory.

Read it on PubMed →