RNMeta-AnalysisWorldviews on evidence-based nursing2026

Global Prevalence of Chronic Pain Among Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Proportional Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Pak Kit Wong, Lizhen Wang, Mu-Hsing Ho and 1 others

PMID 41635052

WHAT IT FOUND

About 41% of cancer survivors had chronic pain lasting at least 3 months across 36 studies.

Rates varied widely by region, cancer type, and how long pain had lasted.

Key findings

01The pooled prevalence of chronic pain among cancer survivors was 41% (95% CI: 34% to 49%).

02Prevalence differed significantly by geographic region, cancer type, and pain duration (all p < 0.001).

03Head and neck cancer survivors had a pooled chronic pain prevalence of 79% (95% CI: 47% to 99%).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The pooled prevalence had very high heterogeneity (I2 = 99.32%). The single 41% estimate may not apply to a particular clinic or cancer type. All included studies were cross-sectional. They report how common chronic pain was at the time measured, not why it developed or whether treatment changed it. Half of the studies assessed female breast cancer survivors specifically. Breast cancer was only 11.6% of global diagnoses in 2022, so other cancers are underrepresented. Only one study included pediatric patients. No studies reported data from South America. The review cannot describe children or South American survivors well. Some studies used unvalidated pain scales. Some did not specify pain duration. These issues can make prevalence estimates inconsistent. Only English or Chinese studies were included. Data from other languages and regions may be missing. Egger's test suggested publication bias (p = 0.026). Trim-and-fill did not change the pooled estimate.

Declared interests

The authors reported nothing to declare and no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the 41% pooled prevalence as a precise estimate for every cancer survivor. The studies were highly heterogeneous (I2 = 99.32%), and prevalence varied widely by region, cancer type, and pain duration.

Read it on PubMed →