Genotype-phenotype correlations with autism spectrum disorder-related traits in noonan syndrome and noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines: a cross-sectional study.
Chloe Alexa McGhee, Julia R Plank, Luca Pannone and 7 others
PMID 41074228WHAT IT FOUND
Children with Noonan syndrome or NSML with PTPN11 or SOS1 variants showed more parent-reported autism-related social and repetitive traits, anxiety, attention and somatic complaints than typical peers.
RAF1 variants looked least different.
Key findings
01Compared with typically developing children, PTPN11-associated Noonan syndrome, PTPN11-associated NSML, and SOS1-associated Noonan syndrome had elevated SRS-2 social responsiveness, restricted and repetitive behaviour, social cognition and social communication scores. RAF1-associated Noonan syndrome did not differ from typically developing children on SRS-2 or CBCL measures.
02Among groups with at least five participants, PTPN11-associated NSML had the highest average SRS-2 and CBCL scores except rule-breaking behaviour, and RAF1-associated Noonan syndrome had the lowest average scores except withdrawn/depressed behaviour.
03For children with PTPN11-associated Noonan syndrome, each one-unit increase in fold activation was associated with a 64% increase in odds of being in the more severe restricted and repetitive behaviours group.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study was cross-sectional and did not test any treatment, so it cannot show that a genotype causes behaviour problems or that a therapy will help. Rare variant groups were very small, especially NSML with seven children and RAF1-associated Noonan syndrome with six, so subgroup findings are uncertain. Children with a documented full-scale IQ below 70 were excluded, so the results may not apply to children with more significant cognitive impairment. Autism-related traits were mostly measured by parent-reported questionnaires, and formal clinical autism diagnoses were not obtained for most participants. The typically developing comparison group was recruited locally and had higher IQ scores than the study group, which may have widened behavioural differences. Some SRS-2 subscale scores have less empirical support than the total score, so subscale patterns should be read cautiously. Biochemical analyses were limited to PTPN11-associated Noonan syndrome, and the fold activation finding was exploratory.
Declared interests
The supplied text lists funding from NIH-funded studies and from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the Neurofibromatosis Therapeutic Acceleration Program and the Stanford Maternal and Child Health Research Institute. It does not include an author conflict-of-interest declaration.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that PTPN11 or SOS1 variants cause autism or that a treatment will work for these children. The study compared groups at one time using parent-reported traits, did not test an intervention, and excluded children with IQ below 70, so it describes associations rather than treatment effects.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →