PTOTOtherBrazilian journal of physical therapy2017

Gait, dual task and history of falls in elderly with preserved cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and mild Alzheimer's disease.

Juliana H Ansai, Larissa P Andrade, Paulo G Rossi and 3 others

PMID 28460713

WHAT IT FOUND

A dual-task Timed Up and Go test separated mild Alzheimer's disease from preserved cognition and mild cognitive impairment.

Usual walking speed did not separate the groups. More people with mild cognitive impairment or mild Alzheimer's disease reported falls, but not more falls each.

Key findings

01The dual-task Timed Up and Go test separated mild Alzheimer's disease from preserved cognition and mild cognitive impairment, while the 10-meter walk test and plain Timed Up and Go test did not separate the groups.

02No measured dual-task variable distinguished mild cognitive impairment from preserved cognition.

0335.0% of preserved-cognition participants, 60.0% of mild-cognitive-impairment participants and 57.9% of mild-Alzheimer's participants reported falls in the last year, but the number of falls did not differ significantly.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study compared groups at the same assessment and asked about falls in the last year, so it cannot show that cognitive impairment caused falls or that a dual-task test prevents falls. Participants had to walk 10 meters alone without a walking aid, so results do not apply to older adults who use a cane, walker or cannot walk that far. The groups were not matched: mild Alzheimer's participants were up to four years older than preserved-cognition participants, and mild cognitive impairment included 34 women compared with 24 and 22 women in the other groups. The paper did not restrict mild cognitive impairment to a subtype, and familiarity with the phone model was not controlled. Each test was performed once, so single-trial performance may vary. The fall history was retrospective, which may be less accurate in people with cognitive impairment.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the dual-task result as a way to identify mild cognitive impairment. No dual-task variable separated preserved cognition from mild cognitive impairment, and the study did not show that cognitive impairment caused the higher percentage of fallers.

Read it on PubMed →