OTRCTAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2026

Feasibility Study of a Novel App-Based Anxiety Intervention for Autistic People.

Bethany Oakley, Charlotte A Boatman, Saffron Baldoza and 10 others

PMID 41392571

WHAT IT FOUND

Autistic adults found the Molehill Mountain app feasible and acceptable.

Anxiety scores fell on average after 13 weeks, but the study had no control group, so it cannot show the app caused improvement.

Key findings

0165% of respondents reported using the app for the full 13 weeks, and 73% found it easy to use overall.

02Average self-reported anxiety decreased after the intervention: GAD-7 fell by 2.88 points and HADS anxiety fell by 1.68 points.

03More app use was not associated with more anxiety change: app usage frequency had no significant effect on GAD-7 scores.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

There was no control group, so the anxiety reduction cannot be separated from natural symptom change, regression to the mean, or expectancy effects. 100 participants were enrolled, and 76 completed the endpoint GAD-7. Six withdrew, including one who said the app increased anxiety. 17 participants reported that the app or its features did not help, or increased anxiety. The sample was mostly female, mostly white, and mostly living independently, so it does not represent all autistic adults. The app content is delivered as written text, so people with lower language or literacy skills may find it hard to use. Some participants found the app stressful, and 29% reported technical issues. The main anxiety measure, GAD-7, was developed for the general population and may not capture autism-specific anxiety experiences. Objective app usage data were available for 77 participants, not all enrolled participants. The study was conducted with research-team support, so real-world uptake without that support is uncertain.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The study was funded by an MRC Confidence in Concept award. The authors also report unrelated grants from the Innovative Medicines Initiative AIMS-2-TRIALS, with support from EU Horizon 2020, EFPIA, SFARI, Autistica and Autism Speaks. The paper states that app technical maintenance and development were provided by EqualEyes, then Old St Labs. The paper also states that the funders had no role in conceptualization or manuscript development.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that the app treats anxiety. The study had no control group, and the authors describe the anxiety reduction as a preliminary signal.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →