Feasibility, acceptability, and experienced benefits of kind acts and gratitude letter interventions among collectivist and individualist culture cancer patients and caregivers: A pilot study.
Lilian J Shin-Cho, Meagan Whisenant, Lorenzo Cohen and 4 others
PMID 40986989WHAT IT FOUND
Cancer patients and caregivers found weekly household contributions or gratitude letters acceptable.
Contributions could make caregivers feel guilty; gratitude letters did not. The pilot did not test whether the activities improve well-being.
Key findings
01Collectivist contribution patients described the acts as a distraction from physical symptoms, and individualist contribution patients said the acts encouraged them that they could do things again.
02Caregivers in the contribution group felt guilty about patients doing things for them, while caregivers in the gratitude group did not report guilt from letters.
03The pilot reported a 19% consent rate, a 76% retention rate, and a 75% adherence rate among collectivist intervention activities.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was a pilot, and the trial yielded only 2 to 6 patients per cell, so it cannot show that the activities improve well-being. Interviews were optional, and only 13 were conducted, so the interview sample may not represent all participants. Only 1 individualist gratitude interview was available, and 1 interview could not be analyzed because of a recording error. The consent rate was 19%, and many contacted people could not be reached, so recruitment may not reflect other settings. The sample was mostly breast and prostate cancer, and collectivist patients were mostly Latino, so results may not apply to other cancers or cultures. The study was done at a top-ranked cancer hospital with many college-educated participants, so lower socioeconomic groups may be underrepresented. Culture was classified by ethnicity, and sex may have confounded cultural effects.
Declared interests
No competing interests were declared.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the reported benefits as proof that kind acts or gratitude letters improve cancer patients' well-being. The trial was a pilot, cells had 2 to 6 patients, and the paper says well-being effect sizes would be meaningless.