SLPRNSystematic ReviewCancer nursing2022

Family Caregivers' Experiences of Caring for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metasynthesis of Qualitative Studies.

Qiaomiao Zeng, Donglan Ling, Wenfeng Chen and 3 others

PMID 35439200

WHAT IT FOUND

Family caregivers of people with head and neck cancer described diagnosis and treatment as distressing, daily life and roles changing, and a need for practical, personalized, long-term support.

Key findings

01Caregivers described accepting the patient's diagnosis and treatment as a distressing process, and they often suppressed distress to protect the family.

02Caring changed daily routines and required new roles, including meal preparation, tube feeding, and commuting.

03Caregivers wanted practical, personalized information and long-term support.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPsWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The review included only English, peer-reviewed studies and no gray literature, so experiences from non-English settings or unpublished work may be missing. The included studies were small, and none reported data saturation, so the themes may not capture all caregiver experiences. Four studies used the same 31 participants, so the 284 caregiver count includes repeated samples. Most caregivers were spouses or partners and female, so experiences of adult children, siblings, parents, and male caregivers are less represented. The review found a lack of longitudinal studies, so how caregiver needs change over time remains uncertain. The synthesis was interpretive, and the authors note other interpretations are possible.

Declared interests

The article is tagged as research supported by a non-U.S. government source, but no funding or conflict-of-interest declaration is given in the supplied text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the reported support needs as proof that caregiver support programmes improve patient or caregiver outcomes. This paper synthesises experiences from qualitative studies and does not test an intervention.

Read it on PubMed →