RNOtherJournal of nursing care quality

Factors Associated With the Quality of Staff-Resident Interactions in Assisted Living.

Anju Paudel, Elizabeth Galik, Barbara Resnick and 3 others

PMID 34446666

WHAT IT FOUND

Assisted living residents with agitation had lower-quality staff interactions.

For-profit facilities had higher interaction scores than nonprofit facilities. In this sample, functional status, depressive symptoms, resistiveness to care, and facility size were not associated.

Key findings

01Residents with agitation had lower-quality staff-resident interactions.

02For-profit assisted living facilities had higher-quality staff-resident interactions than nonprofit facilities.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This was a cross-sectional secondary analysis of baseline data, so it cannot show that agitation, age, or facility ownership caused the interaction quality. Interactions were observed for only about 20 minutes, and staff may have behaved differently when watched. The sample was mostly female, White, and non-Hispanic, and the residents came from 59 assisted living facilities, so the findings may not apply to more diverse settings. Depressive symptoms and resistiveness to care were rare in this sample, so the lack of association may not rule out effects in residents with more of these problems. Staffing levels, staff training, and other staff factors were not measured, even though they could influence interactions. The measured factors together accounted for only 8.2% of the differences in interaction scores, leaving much unexplained.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that agitation causes poor interactions or that for-profit ownership improves care. This was a cross-sectional observation of brief 20-minute interactions, so it shows associations at one time point, not causes.

Read it on PubMed →