Exploring Attitudes and Experiences of People With Knee Osteoarthritis Toward a Self-Directed eHealth Intervention to Support Exercise: Qualitative Study.
Rachel K Nelligan, Rana S Hinman, Pek Ling Teo and 1 others
PMID 33242021WHAT IT FOUND
People with knee osteoarthritis found a self-directed website and SMS program easy to use and helpful for exercising.
However, automated texts caused guilt when they missed sessions. Most wanted a health professional to introduce the program and be available for questions.
Key findings
01Participants valued the credibility of the university source and the simplicity of the exercises, which built confidence to exercise without supervision.
02While SMS messages served as useful reminders, their automated tone triggered feelings of guilt or shame in some participants when they failed to meet exercise targets.
03Most participants preferred the intervention to be provided or endorsed by a health professional, such as a general practitioner or physiotherapist, rather than accessed independently.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The sample size was small (16 participants), limiting the generalizability of the findings. Participants were recruited from an RCT, which may have introduced selection bias as they were already motivated to try a digital health intervention. The interviewer was also involved in designing the intervention and recruiting for the RCT, which could have influenced the data collection. The study reports on experiences and attitudes, not on the clinical efficacy of the intervention itself.
Declared interests
The authors declared that their institutions received grant funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), the Australian Research Council (ARC), and Medibank Private/Better Health Foundation. One author receives royalties from Wolters Kluwer for clinical guidelines. All other authors declared no conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not interpret the reported pain reductions and improved function as proof that the eHealth intervention causes these outcomes. This is a qualitative study of participant experiences, not a controlled trial of efficacy, and the results are based on self-reported perceptions from a small, highly selected sample.