RNSystematic ReviewJournal of psychiatric and mental health nursing2025

Exploration of Effective Substance Use Relapse Prevention Programmes for the Youth: An Integrative Literature Review.

Wada Gaolaolwe, Miriam Mmamphamo Moagi, Gaotswake Patience Kovane and 1 others

PMID 39636187

WHAT IT FOUND

Youth substance use relapse prevention programmes described in the literature emphasised continuing care after treatment: check-ups, monitoring, quick re-entry to treatment, recovery support, and tailored text or app-based follow-up.

These are programme components, not proof an intervention works.

Key findings

01The review synthesised 26 documents, including 23 peer-reviewed articles and 3 grey literature sources, and organised the evidence into three themes: continuing care, technology-mediated recovery management, and developmentally engaging activities.

02Continuing care after treatment was a main theme, including posttreatment check-ups, monitoring, linkage back to treatment, engagement and retention, recovery support services, and at least 3 months of aftercare.

03Technology-mediated aftercare and developmentally engaging activities were reported as relapse prevention supports, including text messages, smartphone apps, internet-based modules, physical activity, self-monitoring and substance-use education.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The review searched only English-language publications, so relevant studies in other languages may have been missed. Some relevant publications may not have been indexed in the chosen databases, and the large number of search results could have introduced selection bias. Three grey literature sources were included, and they were not peer-reviewed. Studies were not excluded based on methodological quality, so lower-quality evidence could influence the themes. Most included studies were from the USA, and the review notes limited empirical evidence for youth substance use relapse prevention in Africa. The review did not combine results statistically or compare programmes directly, so it cannot say which intervention is most effective. The included studies used different age ranges and settings, so the findings may not apply consistently to all young people. Some included programmes combined several supports, such as counselling, case management, family therapy, medical reviews and mentoring, so the review cannot separate the contribution of one component.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The work was funded by North-West University Faculty of Health Sciences.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat the listed components as proven relapse prevention. The review reports themes from diverse studies and grey literature, notes limited empirical evidence in Africa, and says most conclusions focus on American situations.

Read it on PubMed →