Examining the impact of formal planning on performance in older adults using a naturalistic task paradigm.

The paper does not state how participants were placed into formal or informal planning conditions, so differences between those groups could be due to selection. The sample was mostly Caucasian and older adults had more education than younger adults, although education was not related to Amap scores and was not used as a covariate. Participants were cognitively healthy volunteers, not patients with diagnosed cognitive impairment, stroke, dementia, or other conditions requiring therapy. The task took place in an unfamiliar apartment, which may have increased the need for explicit planning compared with familiar daily routines. Execution accuracy may have been affected by a ceiling effect in younger adults. This could have reduced the study's ability to detect interaction effects. The Amap scoring approach is novel, and the paper notes replication may be difficult across settings. Informant cognitive status was not formally tested for the IADL-C ratings. Correlational analyses for some comparisons, especially with the younger adult group, may have been limited by sample size.

No funding or conflict of interest declaration is included in the supplied text.

Do not conclude that formal planning is an established treatment for older adults' everyday independence. The study tested a 5-minute written planning step in cognitively healthy adults in a single apartment task. It showed better efficiency, not better accuracy, and it did not test therapy outcomes or people with diagnosed impairment.