Examining Health Literacy and Appropriateness of Commercially Developed Patient Education Materials for Adults Living With Diabetes on the U.S./Mexico Border.
Shiloh A Williams, Shih-Fan Lin, Stephen Jaime and 2 others
PMID 40415493WHAT IT FOUND
Most adults with diabetes in this rural border sample had inadequate health literacy, and the commercially produced English and Spanish handouts were harder to read than recommended and gave few actionable steps.
Key findings
01Of 132 adults with diabetes, 110 (83.3%) had inadequate health literacy on the Newest Vital Sign.
02The English materials scored 83.33% for understandability and 60.00% for actionability; the Spanish materials scored 61.54% and 20.00%.
03The English materials were at a ninth-grade reading level, significantly higher than the recommended sixth-grade level; the Spanish materials were adjusted to a tenth-grade readability level.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Single rural organization and convenience sample of 132 adults, mostly inpatients and mostly Hispanic, so results may not apply to other settings or groups. Only one commercially produced diabetes document in each language was assessed, because the organization said it provided a single document to patients newly diagnosed or with complications. The study assessed reviewer ratings and recorded health literacy scores, not direct patient comprehension or diabetes outcomes. Health literacy scores came from the electronic health record rather than being collected specifically for this study. Spanish readability required adjustment with the SOL formula because SMOG was developed for English texts.
Declared interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that these commercially produced diabetes handouts are effective or appropriate simply because they are available in English and Spanish. The study did not test patient outcomes, and the materials were harder to read than recommended and scored poorly for actionability, especially in Spanish.