PTQualitativePhysiotherapy2021

Evaluation of the First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) model of primary care: a qualitative insight.

R Goodwin, F Moffatt, P Hendrick and 3 others

PMID 34583834

WHAT IT FOUND

People using first contact physiotherapy and staff reported positive experiences and confidence in physiotherapists, but capacity was too low to reduce GP workload.

Work advice was seen as central, and many patients needed reception signposting because they did not know the service existed.

Key findings

01GPs reported confidence in FCP competence and welcomed the service, but participants said current FCP capacity was too low to reduce GP workload.

02Patients reported satisfaction with FCP services, but many were unaware of the service and relied on reception signposting.

03FCPs stated they would consider work-related issues with every patient of working age, and participants from all groups advocated giving FCPs legislative authority to sign patients off work.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This is a qualitative evaluation of experiences and discourse, not a test of whether FCP improves musculoskeletal health or reduces GP workload. The 39 participants came from sites with very different service models, populations and FCP capacity, so the findings may not apply to every FCP service. Data collection in Scotland and Northern Ireland was cancelled because of the pandemic, so transferability is limited. The FCP participants were experienced clinicians with advanced practice skills, so the findings may not apply to less experienced FCPs. Participants were recruited by convenience from services that agreed to take part, and patient access was often mediated by reception signposting, so the views may not represent patients who did not use the service.

Declared interests

The evaluation was funded by the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy CSP Charitable Trust, Registered Charity No 279882, and The Work and Health Unit, a cross-government unit jointly sponsored by the Department for Work and Pensions and the Department of Health and Social Care. The authors declared no conflict of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the positive comments as evidence that first contact physiotherapy reduces GP workload or improves musculoskeletal outcomes. This paper reports experiences and themes from 39 participants, and participants said current capacity was too low to reduce GP workload.

Read it on PubMed →