Evaluating the Efficacy of Capacitive Resistive Monopolar Radiofrequency Combined With Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in Managing Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomised Controlled Trial.
Ivan Jurak, Silvija Grabar, Nikolino Žura and 1 others
PMID 39572389WHAT IT FOUND
Adding 448 kHz radiofrequency to PNF exercises reduced chronic low back pain 2.46 cm more on a 0 to 10 cm scale than PNF alone, and disability by 17.1 points more.
No side effects were reported, but there was no placebo group.
Key findings
01Pain (a primary outcome) fell 2.46 cm more and Oswestry disability scores (the other primary outcome) fell 17.1 points more in the group that received radiofrequency plus PNF than in the group that received PNF alone.
02No participants dropped out between randomisation and analysis, and no harms or unintended side effects were reported in either group.
03The trial had no placebo group and no follow-up after treatment ended, so it cannot say how much of the improvement was a placebo effect or whether it lasted.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
There was no placebo or sham group, and the authors say that because the device produces a distinctive heating sensation they could not build a convincing dummy treatment. The improvement could therefore be partly a placebo response to a new, high-technology intervention, and the size of that contribution is unknown. Nobody was assessed after the treatment block ended, so the study says nothing about whether the pain and disability gains lasted beyond the day after the last session. Only 62 people were treated, all at one private clinic, and the authors themselves say this limits how far the results apply to other settings and populations. The people treating the participants knew who was getting which treatment, and participants could tell whether they were receiving the extra radiofrequency, so expectation on both sides could have influenced the self-reported pain and disability scores. The two groups differed in education level, with more high-school leavers in the combined group and more graduates in the control group, and both groups were largely at low risk of persistent disability on the screening tool used. Both groups received PNF exercise, so the trial tested whether adding radiofrequency helps, not whether PNF itself works. Ten sessions in two weeks is an intensive schedule that many patients cannot attend, and the results may not carry over to a more typical once- or twice-weekly course.
Declared interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The paper does not state who funded the work or whether the device manufacturer had any involvement.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as proof that radiofrequency treats chronic low back pain. Both groups were doing PNF exercise, there was no placebo group, and outcomes were measured only one day after the last session, so part of the extra improvement may be a placebo response to the device and nobody knows whether the gains lasted.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →