Evaluating relationships between lung cancer stigma, anxiety, and depressive symptoms and the absence of empathic opportunities presented during routine clinical consultations.
Timothy J Williamson, Jamie S Ostroff, Chloé M Martin and 4 others
PMID 32859447WHAT IT FOUND
Overall, patients who did not express emotions, challenges, or progress did not differ in total stigma or depressive symptoms.
Stigma about sharing their diagnosis was higher among racial minority patients who did not express these, while anxiety was higher among white patients who did.
Key findings
01Racial minority patients who did not present empathic opportunities reported higher adjusted disclosure-related stigma than those who presented at least one.
02White patients who presented at least one empathic opportunity reported higher adjusted anxiety than those who did not.
03Total lung cancer stigma and depressive symptoms did not differ between patients who did and did not present empathic opportunities.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 56 analyzable patients were studied, so the findings are hypothesis-generating and not robust. Too few participants identified as Black/African American, Asian/Pacific Islander, or other race to analyze separately, so racial minority findings are broad. The race interaction was not part of the original plan; subgroup differences were examined after the interaction was found. The study examined whether patients presented empathic opportunities, not how clinicians responded to them. Only English-speaking patients with lung cancer or a suspicious mass and a smoking history were included, limiting generalizability. Clinician characteristics, such as clinician race and communication style, were not measured. Audio recordings did not capture non-verbal cues, and empathic opportunity types were not analyzed separately because 34.3% of patients who presented one also presented multiple types.
Declared interests
The supplied text gives no author conflict-of-interest declaration. The article is tagged as supported by NIH extramural research.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the subgroup differences as confirmed effects. The study had 56 patients, was described as hypothesis-generating, and the race interaction was not part of the original plan.