Applied Evidence

Ethical reflections on the use of the category "children with disabilities" in quantitative research.

Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026 · Other

Christian Møller-Skau

PMID 42688248

A philosophical ethics paper arguing that labelling children as 'disabled' in statistics carries moral risks.

It offers no clinical evidence, no patient data, and no guidance for treatment decisions.

What this paper is

This is a perspective article on research ethics and moral philosophy. It contains no clinical methods, no participants, no intervention, no measured outcomes, and no results. It is a theoretical reflection on how the category 'children with disabilities' is used in quantitative statistics, drawing on utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics. There is nothing to summarise as a clinical finding.

Declared interests

The author declared that no financial support was received for the work or its publication.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →


The study

Certainty of evidence
Low

Browse

    Cite

    Christian Møller-Skau Ethical reflections on the use of the category "children with disabilities" in quantitative research. Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences. 2026.

    Read the original — we summarise, we never replace the paper.