Establishing dimensionality of sexual behaviours in patients with regional brain dysfunction.
Robert A Fieo, Hannah Silverman, Deirdre O'Shea and 3 others
PMID 30010443WHAT IT FOUND
Caregiver ratings of sexual changes in 151 patients with brain injury or dementia separated into three usable domains: prosocial behaviour, inappropriate behaviour, and sexual interest.
The detachment domain and several items were too sparse to use.
Key findings
01Caregiver ratings from 151 participants with brain injury or dementia produced four sexual behaviour domains, and three met the study's reliability standard.
02The prosocial sexual behaviour domain had the highest reliability value (.80), followed by sexual interest (.74) and inappropriate sexual behaviour (.71). The detachment domain did not meet the .70 minimum.
03Ten items were excluded because caregivers often did not answer them, and eight items were not endorsed by any caregiver, leaving 35 items for analysis.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they found
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The sample size was small enough that many items had too few responses, so the five-point frequency answers were collapsed into yes/no answers, which reduced information. Ten items were excluded because caregivers often did not answer them, and eight items were not endorsed by any caregiver. The TBI group was made up entirely of male Vietnam veterans, so the findings do not show how the scale works in women or younger patients with TBI. Many informants did not know the veterans before injury, so the analysis used only current symptoms and did not use premorbid base rates. The caregivers were mostly heterosexual spouses or partners, so the scale was not tested with same-sex couples or other caregiver relationships. The study did not compare the scale with a normal population or test item bias, so it cannot show that the domains work equally well across groups. The Detachment domain did not meet the reliability standard, so it should not be interpreted as a stable scale component.
Declared interests
The authors report no potential conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not treat the SNIQ as an established clinical tool for therapists. It tested how caregiver ratings grouped into domains, not whether the scale improves care, and the detachment domain did not meet the reliability standard.