PTOtherProsthetics and orthotics international2018

Enhancement of a prosthetic knee with a microprocessor-controlled gait phase switch reduces falls and improves balance confidence and gait speed in community ambulators with unilateral transfemoral amputation.

Sara Agueda Fuenzalida Squella, Andreas Kannenberg, Ângelo Brandão Benetti

PMID 28691574

WHAT IT FOUND

Fall risk tests did not show a difference, but self-reported falls decreased by 77% in the 12 analyzed after an extreme outlier was excluded.

Walking distance and balance confidence also improved with the microprocessor-enhanced knee.

Key findings

01The tests used to indicate fall risk, the TUG, FSST, and FES-I, did not show significant differences between the old non-microprocessor knee and the 3E80 knee.

02After excluding one participant with 280 falls in 4 weeks on the old knee and no falls on the 3E80, the remaining 12 participants reported 77% fewer falls (p = .04).

03Walking distance in the 2-minute walk test improved significantly on level and uneven ground, with a speed increase of 0.18 m/s, above the 0.1 m/s clinically meaningful threshold.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 13 participants completed, and the falls analysis used 12 after excluding one extreme outlier, so the study did not reach its planned minimum sample of 15. The participants were young and high functioning, with a mean age of 33.1 years and Medicare Functional Classification Level 3, so results may not apply to older or less able amputators. The order of knee conditions was not randomized, and neither participants nor assessors were blinded. The old knee condition was not standardized, and participants kept their existing prosthetic feet. Some outcome measures were developed for this study and have not yet been validated. The accommodation period was 8 weeks and training was only 2 hours, and there is no consensus on optimal accommodation time. Referral through prosthetic clinics could introduce selection bias. People who use walking aids, have poor socket fit, or have additional major amputations were excluded.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest, but the research grant came from Ottobock to FACTI, which employs two named authors; one author is a full-time Ottobock employee; Ottobock provided the intervention knees; and an Ottobock do Brasil prosthetist fitted them.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that the 3E80 knee prevents falls in all people with transfemoral amputation. The 77% fall reduction was reported in 12 participants after one extreme outlier was excluded, the study was not randomized or blinded, and the TUG, FSST, and FES-I fall risk tests were not significant.

Read it on PubMed →