Engagement in purposeful activities and social interactions amongst persons with dementia in special care units compared to traditional nursing homes: An observational study.
Laura Adlbrecht, Tamara Nemeth, Florian Frommlet and 2 others
PMID 34291489WHAT IT FOUND
Mornings and evenings showed no difference in engagement, but special care unit residents engaged more in purposeful activities and social interactions in the afternoon.
Both groups spent half their observed time without engagement.
Key findings
01Afternoon engagement in purposeful activities was higher in special care units than traditional nursing homes (mean 0.63 vs 0.48; adjusted odds ratio 2.238, p < 0.001).
02Afternoon social interaction was higher in special care units than traditional nursing homes (mean 0.37 vs 0.15; adjusted odds ratio 3.25, p < 0.001).
03In both settings, residents spent half their time without engaging in activities or social interactions.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was an observational comparison of existing settings, not a randomised trial, so it cannot show that the special care unit caused higher afternoon engagement. The special care unit sample was small (33 residents), and participation was 52% in special care units and 35% in traditional nursing homes. The special care unit targeted people with moderate dementia, so findings may not apply to people with mild or severe dementia. The special care unit was a complex bundle of design, staff training, staff presence and personalised activities, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. Each resident was observed once at each time point, so the study cannot show how long individual engagements lasted or how residents experienced them. Agitation and emotion were measured by observation and may be affected by variability in expression; no significant differences between settings were found. The study did not correct for multiple testing because it was exploratory. The study was supported by SeneCura, although the authors state the funder did not influence the study or outcomes.
Declared interests
The study was supported by SeneCura. The authors state the funder did not influence the study or its outcomes, that they were free to report unfavourable results, and that they have no conflicts of interest to report.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that special care units cause more engagement or better wellbeing. The study was observational, compared one specific care concept with two traditional nursing homes, and found differences only in the afternoon; agitation and emotion did not differ, and both groups spent half their time without engagement.