RNPilotEuropean journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society2017

Empowering survivors after colorectal and lung cancer treatment: Pilot study of a Self-Management Survivorship Care Planning intervention.

Anne Reb, Nora Ruel, Marwan Fakih and 7 others

PMID 28720259

WHAT IT FOUND

An advanced practice nurse-led survivorship plan plus one coaching session was feasible and acceptable for colorectal and lung cancer survivors.

Thirty survivors completed it. Score changes were exploratory and cannot prove the plan worked.

Key findings

01Thirty of 41 enrolled colorectal and lung cancer survivors completed the study with evaluable data, and sessions took 34.2 minutes on average.

02Survivors rated the treatment summary and follow-up surveillance tests 3.5 out of 4.0 for helpfulness, and the plan format 3.4 out of 4.0 for user-friendliness.

03Exploratory pre-post comparisons reported significant changes in depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, and several quality-of-life domains, but the study had no control group.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Small single-group pilot with no randomisation, no control group, and no power calculation, so changes cannot be attributed to the intervention. 41 survivors consented and enrolled, but only 30 completed the study with evaluable data; attrition was 26.8%. The sample was primarily Caucasian, retired, highly educated, high income, and mostly stage I or II disease, so results may not apply to other groups. Baseline depression and anxiety were low and self-efficacy was high, leaving little room for improvement. The intervention included a personalized treatment summary/care plan, nurse-led review, self-management coaching, and usual post-treatment care, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. The satisfaction survey was self-administered and did not allow probing or clarification. Plan preparation time may not generalise because information was documented in separate electronic locations.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the significant pre-post changes as proof that the survivorship care plan improves depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, or quality of life. The primary aim was feasibility and acceptability, there was no control group, and the comparisons were exploratory.

Read it on PubMed →