Case-ControlAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2019

Electrophysiological alterations in motor-auditory predictive coding in autism spectrum disorder.

Thijs van Laarhoven, Jeroen J Stekelenburg, Mart L J M Eussen and 1 others

PMID 30801964

WHAT IT FOUND

Autistic participants did not show the typical reduction in an early brain response to sounds they made themselves.

Controls did. This is a laboratory neural difference, not evidence of a therapy target.

Key findings

01Typically developing participants showed a smaller early auditory brain response when they made the tone themselves than when the same tone was replayed.

02Participants with ASD did not show this smaller early response for self-made tones.

03The early response was faster for self-made tones in both groups, so the timing effect was not unique to ASD.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they found

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study compared groups in a laboratory EEG task and did not test any therapy, so it cannot tell a therapist what to change for a patient. The participants were aged 15 to 25 years and had full-scale IQ scores of 80 or higher, so the finding may not apply to younger children, older adults, or people with intellectual disability. The autism group was recruited from a mental health institution and all were receiving clinical treatment for severe mental problems and impaired daily living functioning, so the result may not apply to people with ASD who are not in intensive treatment. The autism group had a lower average full-scale IQ than the control group, although the authors reported a further check that this did not explain the absent early brain response. The authors state that the study cannot tell whether the brain difference reflected impaired timing prediction, identity prediction, or a more general prediction mechanism. The paper did not report a link between the electrophysiological result and social communication, sensory difficulties, or daily living functioning.

Declared interests

The supplied text does not report a funding source or conflict-of-interest declaration.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that this identifies a treatment target for autism. The study measured a brief brain response in a laboratory button-press task and did not test therapy or patient outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
30 individuals with ASD and 30 individuals with typical development
Certainty of evidence
Low

Browse

    Cite

    Thijs van Laarhoven, Jeroen J Stekelenburg, Mart L J M Eussen, et al. Electrophysiological alterations in motor-auditory predictive coding in autism spectrum disorder. Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research. 2019.

    Read the original