Efficacy of therapeutic ultrasound in the treatment of chronic calcific shoulder tendinitis: a randomized trial.
Stjepan Čota, Valentina Delimar, Iva Žagar and 5 others
PMID 36723056WHAT IT FOUND
In chronic calcific shoulder tendinitis, therapeutic ultrasound added to exercises reduced calcification size more than sham ultrasound added to exercises.
Pain and range of motion did not show clear between-group differences.
Key findings
01Calcification size reduction, the primary outcome, favored the treatment group over the placebo group.
02Everyday disability, global health, and handgrip strength improved more in the treatment group than in the placebo group.
03Pain scores and shoulder range of motion did not show clear between-group differences.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Randomization was by shoulder, not by patient, and 6 patients received treatment on both shoulders, so whole-person outcomes such as HAQ-DI may be confounded. Calcification size was measured with two-dimensional ultrasound, not three-dimensional volume, so the true size change may be less certain. Only 46 patients (52 shoulders) completed, and the study measured outcomes immediately after treatment, so long-term benefit is unknown. The study excluded many other shoulder problems, including rotator cuff tear, bursitis, frozen shoulder, inflammatory disease, and recent shoulder therapy, so it applies only to the selected chronic calcific shoulder tendinitis group. Both groups received the same supervised therapeutic exercises, so the study cannot show what active therapeutic ultrasound would do without exercise.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that therapeutic ultrasound alone treats calcific shoulder tendinitis or reliably improves pain. Both groups received the same supervised therapeutic exercises, and the clearest between-group difference was calcification size; pain scores and shoulder range of motion did not show clear between-group differences.