Efficacy of Motivational Interviewing and Brief Interventions on tobacco use among healthy adults: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Rajesh Kumar, Maya Sahu, Tamar Rodney
PMID 36867776WHAT IT FOUND
Brief advice and motivational interviewing reduced tobacco use in seven of twelve trials, but other trials showed no clear advantage and the review could not reach a specific conclusion.
Key findings
01Seven of the 12 included randomized trials reported a beneficial effect of brief advice or motivational interviewing on reducing tobacco use.
02Several included trials found no clear advantage over comparison conditions.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The review included only 12 randomized trials, so it is not a large evidence base. The included trials used different forms of brief intervention and motivational interviewing, so the results cannot be combined into one clear answer. The populations were heterogeneous, including university students, waterpipe smokers, light smokers, and nurses, so findings may not apply to all adults. Many outcomes were self-reported rather than biochemically verified. Some trials had small samples or pilot designs. The review reported that reduction of smoking behavior or abstinence was not sustained over time. The authors stated that treatment fidelity and the limited number of studies require cautious interpretation.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that brief interventions or motivational interviewing reliably cause long-term tobacco cessation. Only seven of twelve trials reported a beneficial effect, and the review reported that reduction or abstinence was not sustained over time.