Efficacy of brain-computer interface training with motor imagery-contingent feedback in improving upper limb function and neuroplasticity among persons with chronic stroke: a double-blinded, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial.
Myeong Sun Kim, Hyunju Park, Ilho Kwon and 6 others
PMID 39757218WHAT IT FOUND
In chronic stroke, contingent-feedback BCI with electrical stimulation and virtual hand feedback plus conventional therapy improved wrist extensor strength more than independent-feedback BCI with electrical stimulation and virtual hand feedback plus conventional therapy, but wrist extension range did not differ significantly between groups.
Key findings
01Among participants receiving BCI with electrical stimulation and virtual hand feedback plus conventional therapy, the contingent-feedback group had 0.52 higher wrist extensor strength scores on the 0-5 MRC scale than the independent-feedback group at 4 weeks (95% CI 0.03–1.00; p=0.036).
02Within the contingent-feedback group, which received BCI with electrical stimulation and virtual hand feedback plus conventional therapy, wrist extensor strength and active wrist extension improved significantly from baseline to 4 weeks (p=0.002; p=0.019).
03For Fugl-Meyer outcomes (total 0-66, distal 0-24, hand 0-14), no difference between groups over time was found; the independent-feedback group, which received the same BCI with electrical stimulation and virtual hand feedback plus conventional therapy, improved significantly on total (p=0.005), distal (p=0.020), and hand (p=0.009) subscores, while the contingent-feedback group did not.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The sample was small and sized as a pilot: 27 were recruited, but 25 were analysed after two contingent-feedback participants dropped out. It was a single rehabilitation hospital, so results may not generalise. Only chronic stroke (at least 6 months after onset) was included, so early stroke recovery is not addressed. The sample size did not allow meaningful subgroup analysis by lesion location or size. MEP/TMS data were available for only five participants and were not statistically analysed, so corticospinal excitability evidence is very limited. One participant's EEG data were excluded for insufficient artifact-free epochs, leaving 24 for functional connectivity analysis. Both groups received the same BCI hardware, electrical stimulation, virtual feedback and conventional therapy, so the effect of contingency alone cannot be separated from those components. Participants had severe wrist extensor weakness (MRC score 2 or less), so findings may not apply to milder or more functional patients.
Declared interests
Funded by the Translational Research Program for Rehabilitation Robots, National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that BCI training alone caused the wrist strength gain. Both groups received the same BCI hardware, electrical stimulation, virtual hand feedback and 30 minutes of conventional upper-limb therapy, and only wrist extensor strength differed significantly between groups; active wrist extension range and Fugl-Meyer outcomes did not show a clear contingent-feedback advantage.