PTMeta-AnalysisPM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2026

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Noemí Moreno-Segura, Sara Mollà-Casanova, Elena Muñoz-Gómez and 2 others

PMID 41876969

WHAT IT FOUND

Active tDCS compared with sham reduced self-reported pain and improved pressure pain thresholds, but it did not change conditioned pain modulation.

Evidence for function was low certainty.

Key findings

01In trials comparing active tDCS with sham, active tDCS significantly reduced self-reported pain intensity.

02In trials comparing active tDCS with sham, active tDCS significantly improved pressure pain thresholds, but conditioned pain modulation did not differ.

03In the pooled analysis, self-reported WOMAC function favored active tDCS, but the certainty of evidence for function was low.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The meta-analysis included only 7 trials, so the pooled estimates rest on a limited number of studies. The trials used different tDCS doses and schedules, including 5, 10, 15, 16, or 30 sessions, and the review could not compare different durations or doses because there were not enough studies. Some trials combined tDCS with other treatments, including therapeutic exercise, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation or electrical intramuscular stimulation, meditation, or conventional physiotherapy, so the contribution of tDCS alone cannot be assumed. Blinding of the outcome assessor was the most frequently observed bias. The certainty of evidence for function was low because the WOMAC reflects self-reported function rather than objectively tested performance. Conditioned pain modulation showed no significant difference and had substantial heterogeneity, so the review does not show an effect on endogenous pain inhibition. The included adults had at least moderate knee osteoarthritis and no comorbidities that could affect knee function or pain, so the results may not apply to patients with more complex problems. The studies by Ahn et al. had substantial influence on the overall results and conclusions.

Declared interests

This work was supported in part by the Spanish Government and the European Union European Regional Development Fund under grant PID2021-125694OB-I00, and by Generalitat Valenciana under CIAICO/2024/107. The funding information also names Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación. The authors declared no conflict of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that tDCS alone reliably improves knee osteoarthritis pain or function. Several trials added other treatments, such as therapeutic exercise, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation or electrical intramuscular stimulation, meditation, or conventional physiotherapy, and the review did not show that tDCS alone is responsible for all reported improvements. The function result was also rated low certainty.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
1045 participants completed interventions in the qualitative synthesis; 738 participants were included in the meta-analysis.
Certainty of evidence
Moderate

More in orthopaedic

Browse

Cite

Noemí Moreno-Segura, Sara Mollà-Casanova, Elena Muñoz-Gómez, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation. 2026.

Read the original