Effects of the INSIGHT Obesity Preventive Intervention on Reported and Observed Infant Temperament.
Stephanie Anzman-Frasca, Ian M Paul, Kameron J Moding and 3 others
PMID 29927795WHAT IT FOUND
Responsive parenting home visits on sleep, feeding, soothing, and play led to less reported distress and faster calming at 1 year, but not better reported regulation.
Observed distress did not differ, while self-comforting was higher than controls.
Key findings
01At 1 year, mothers in the responsive parenting group reported lower overall infant negativity, mainly because their infants showed less distress to limitations and recovered from distress faster.
02Observed infant negativity did not differ by group, but observed self-soothing during the toy-return episode was higher in the responsive parenting group, mainly self-comforting strategies.
03Mother-reported regulation did not differ at 1 year, and observed regulation did not differ during the toy-removal episode.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they found
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The sample was predominantly White and well-educated, so the results may not apply to more diverse families. Infant temperament was not measured before the intervention began, so the study cannot show how much each infant changed from their own starting point. The observed temperament task was one laboratory situation on one day, and effect sizes for significant findings were 0.26 to 0.36, described as small to medium. The intervention combined sleep, feeding, soothing, and play guidance, so the study cannot identify which component mattered. At age 16 weeks, some intervention sessions had already occurred, so early temperament differences cannot be treated as a clean baseline. This analysis reports temperament outcomes, not the trial's obesity prevention outcomes. At age 1 year, 253 of 279 mother-infant pairs remained, with loss to follow-up and personal constraints among dropout reasons. Analyses used 240 or 230 of the 291 randomized pairs, because 1-year temperament data were missing for some participants.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read these temperament differences as proof that the program will improve obesity outcomes or later development. The trial did not measure infant temperament before the intervention, the observed effects were small to medium and came from one laboratory situation, and the sample was predominantly White and well-educated.