Effects of technological running shoes versus barefoot running on the intrinsic foot muscles, ankle mobility, and dynamic control: a novel cross-sectional research.
María García-Arrabé, Iván Batuecas-Sánchez, Silvia de Vidania and 3 others
PMID 38964202WHAT IT FOUND
Experienced barefoot runners had thicker plantar fascia and larger quadratus plantae and abductor digiti minimi cross-sectional areas, and greater ankle dorsiflexion than technological-shoe runners; dynamic balance was similar.
This compares groups, not proves footwear caused the differences.
Key findings
01Technological footwear runners had significantly lower plantar fascia thickness (mean difference -0.10 cm; 95% CI -0.13 to -0.05), quadratus plantae cross-sectional area (-0.45 cm²; 95% CI -0.77 to -0.12), and abductor digiti minimi cross-sectional area (-0.49 cm²; 95% CI -0.70 to -0.17) than barefoot runners.
02Ankle dorsiflexion was significantly greater in barefoot runners, with a reported mean difference of -5.12° (95% CI -8.6 to -1.7).
03Dynamic balance did not differ between groups: YBT anterior mean difference 4.10 cm (95% CI -0.85 to 9.06), YBT-L 1.19 cm (95% CI -4.44 to 6.82), and YBT-M -0.69 cm (95% CI -6.06 to 4.69).
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study was cross-sectional and compared runners who already chose technological footwear or barefoot running, so it cannot show that footwear caused the differences. There was no non-runner control group, so it is unclear whether the barefoot runners' foot muscle and ankle mobility values are better than a general population or simply typical of barefoot runners. The paper did not measure running gait or ankle and foot mechanics during running, so it cannot link the ultrasound and mobility findings to running technique or injury risk. Participants were experienced runners who had run regularly for at least 1 year and were injury-free in the previous 6 months, so findings may not apply to novice runners or people with current lower limb problems. The direction of the flexor hallucis longus thickness result is inconsistent between the results text and Table 2, making that specific finding hard to interpret. The sample size was calculated for one muscle measure from a small pilot, not for all outcomes. Measurements were taken only on the dominant lower limb, so bilateral differences were not assessed.
Declared interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The supplied text does not state who funded the study.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that technological shoes weaken intrinsic foot muscles or that barefoot running should be prescribed to strengthen them. The study compared existing groups at one time point, did not randomise footwear, and did not measure changes over time or running mechanics.