Effects of pelvic tilt angles and forced vital capacity in healthy individuals.
Young-In Hwang, Ki-Song Kim
PMID 29410572WHAT IT FOUND
Healthy adults had higher peak flow and one-second breath out when pelvis was neutral on a stability ball than tilted 10° forward or back.
Peak flow was not clearly higher than back tilt.
Key findings
01Peak expiratory flow was 283.42 l/min in neutral position, 253.28 l/min at 10° anterior tilt and 270.78 l/min at 10° posterior tilt; neutral was higher than anterior (p=0.021) but not posterior (p=0.561).
02FEV1 was 2.41 l in neutral position, 2.28 l at 10° anterior tilt and 2.27 l at 10° posterior tilt; neutral was higher than both tilts (p=0.010, p=0.000).
03There was no difference between 10° anterior and 10° posterior tilt for peak expiratory flow (p=0.098) or FEV1 (p=1.000).
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 18 healthy participants were tested, and they were 16 female and 2 male, so the results may not apply to men or to people with respiratory disease. The study did not meet the requirement that sitting height be identical when measuring pelvic tilt angles with the Palpation Meter. The number of male participants who could perform 10° anterior tilt was fewer than female participants, creating gender differences. The hypothesis was not fully supported for peak expiratory flow, because posterior tilt was not significantly different from neutral. The supplied text reports peak expiratory flow and FEV1, not forced vital capacity values, despite the title and discussion referring to forced vital capacity. The study did not include patients with respiratory disorders, who may have different thoracic flexibility and trunk muscle states.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that pelvic tilt on a stability ball improves breathing in patients. The study measured 18 healthy participants, and the peak flow difference between neutral and posterior tilt was not significant.