PTOtherHong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao2026

Effects of empowered relief on pain catastrophizing and outcomes post-total knee arthroplasty: A quasi-experimental study.

Qiongfang Cui, Han Zhao, Peiwei Qin and 3 others

PMID 42688464

WHAT IT FOUND

Knee replacement patients who also got a two-hour Empowered Relief session before surgery scored much lower on catastrophic thinking about pain three months later than those given usual care alone (median 5 versus 19.5).

Groups were not randomly assigned, so this is not proof.

Key findings

01Three months after surgery the median pain catastrophising score was 5 in the Empowered Relief group and 19.5 in the usual-care group; before surgery the control group scored 43 and the intervention group 42.

02Pain intensity at three months was lower in the intervention group (median 1) than in the usual-care group (median 2), and the one-point gap met the minimum clinically important difference the authors cite for knee replacement patients.

03Painkiller use after discharge was no different between the two groups in type, dose or frequency.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Patients were not randomly assigned. They went into groups according to the dates they had surgery, which the authors accept risks selection bias and limits how far the results can be relied on. Only 64 people from one hospital in China were analysed, and almost all had junior high school education or less, so the findings may not transfer to other patients or services. Only patients who completed follow-up were analysed and the missing data were simply dropped, which can bias the results. Follow-up stopped at three months, so nothing is known about longer-term effects. The intervention was a package: education, relaxation training, positive self-talk and imagery, distraction, a personal pain-relief plan, and daily WeChat reminders with continued contact from the research team. The control group had one-off education with no follow-up support. There is no way to tell which part of the package did the work, or how much of the difference came from the extra attention and contact. The authors did not calculate an effect size, so the size of the benefit is hard to judge. People with any other psychiatric or psychological disorder, cognitive impairment, a history of opioid abuse, or pain from another cause were excluded, so the results do not speak to them.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The work was funded by three Chinese regional programmes: the Scientific and Technological Innovation Programme of Lanzhou (CY2022-HL-B02), the Innovation Fund for Higher Education of Gansu Province (2022B-045), and the 2024 Gansu Provincial Health Industry Science and Technology Programme (GSWSQN 2024-12). The paper does not say what role, if any, the funders had in the study.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as proof that a pre-surgery Empowered Relief session reduces pain after knee replacement. Patients were not randomly assigned to their groups, the study was small and from a single hospital, and the intervention group also received daily reminders and ongoing contact that the control group did not, so part of the difference may not come from the session itself. Painkiller use after discharge was the same in both groups, so the session did not translate into fewer or lower-dose painkillers.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →