Effects of Cold Compress on Pain and Vascular Complications in Patients With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Yi-Da Li, Ying-Chin Liao
PMID 42579521WHAT IT FOUND
After transfemoral PCI, cold compresses, sometimes with sandbag, direct pressure, or early ambulation, reduced puncture-site pain, bleeding, and hematoma versus routine care; ecchymosis was not significantly reduced.
Key findings
01Cold compress interventions reduced puncture-site pain compared with routine care in 4 trials (434 patients).
02Cold compress interventions reduced bleeding in 5 trials (470 patients) and hematoma in 4 trials (440 patients).
03Ecchymosis was not significantly reduced in 4 trials (260 patients).
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
All included trials were done in Asian countries and mostly involved patients aged 50 to 70, so results may not apply in other settings or age groups. Cold compress protocols varied widely in timing, temperature, weight, duration, and frequency, so the best way to apply the intervention is unclear. None of the trials blinded participants, providers, or outcome assessors, which is especially important for subjective pain ratings. Only a few trials contributed to each outcome, so confidence in the pooled estimates is limited. The studies mostly measured short-term outcomes, so longer-term effects are unclear.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as proof that cold compresses alone prevent all puncture-site complications. Bleeding and hematoma were reduced, but ecchymosis was not significantly reduced, and some trials also used sandbag compression, direct pressure, or early ambulation, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated.