RNRCTScandinavian journal of caring sciences2025

Effects of an Online Theory-Based Educational Programme for Primiparous Women on Improving Breastfeeding-Related Outcomes: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Mei Sze Wong, Wai Tong Chien

PMID 39865520

WHAT IT FOUND

At 6 months, the online breastfeeding programme did not show a clear difference in exclusive breastfeeding.

At 2 months, 70.67% versus 40.85% favoured the programme, and breastfeeding confidence scores rose at both time points.

Key findings

01At 2 months postpartum, 70.67% of mothers in the online programme were exclusively breastfeeding versus 40.85% in usual care, but at 6 months the difference was not significant (adjusted RR = 1.78, 95% CI 0.96-3.32, p = 0.068).

02Breastfeeding confidence scores increased more in the online programme than usual care at 2 months (β = 6.86, p = 0.006) and 6 months (β = 7.14, p = 0.018).

03Average exclusive breastfeeding duration was longer in the online programme (111.25 days) than usual care (71.92 days), p = 0.002.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Participants were recruited by convenience sampling and were mostly low-risk first-time mothers with relatively high breastfeeding intention, so results may not apply to multiparous women, high-risk pregnancies, or mothers with low intention to breastfeed. Most participants were highly educated, employed, and had family support or income above HKD30,000, which may not represent all mothers. Mothers could attend other antenatal breastfeeding talks, and the analysis adjusted for this, but additional education may still confound the effect. Recruitment was mainly through online advertisements, which may miss some primiparous communities. Many mothers were excluded from breastfeeding initiation analysis, reducing statistical power for that outcome. Mothers knew which group they were in, and most outcomes were self-reported, so social desirability or response bias is possible. Infant hospitalisation was rare, so the study had little ability to detect a difference in infant morbidity. The 6-month exclusive breastfeeding result was not significant, and the confidence interval included no effect.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The paper does not report a funder.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that this programme improves exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months. The 6-month exclusive breastfeeding result was not significant (adjusted RR = 1.78, 95% CI 0.96-3.32, p = 0.068), and the study did not show a difference in infant hospitalisation or postnatal depression.

Read it on PubMed →