RNMeta-AnalysisInvestigacion y educacion en enfermeria2025

Effectiveness of Nursing Interventions in Reducing Maternal Mortality in Resource-Limited Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jasneet Kaur, Sheela Upendra

PMID 41289537

WHAT IT FOUND

Direct effects on maternal mortality were inconclusive, but maternal care programs involving nurses increased antenatal visits in low-resource settings.

Key findings

01The primary outcome, maternal mortality, was not meta-analysed because effect sizes and definitions were insufficient and inconsistent.

02Only three studies could be pooled; multi-component programs involving nurses or midwifery workers increased antenatal care coverage to four or more visits (pooled OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.06-2.08).

03Calibrated blood-collection drape plus WHO first-response treatment bundle (uterine massage, oxytocics, tranexamic acid, IV fluids, examination, escalation), delivered by midwives, reduced a composite of severe postpartum hemorrhage (≥1000 mL blood loss), laparotomy, or maternal death (RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.32-0.50).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only three studies could be meta-analysed, and only for antenatal care with four or more visits; maternal mortality, facility delivery and morbidity were synthesized narratively. Mortality was often embedded in composite outcomes, so the review cannot show that nursing or midwifery interventions reduced maternal death specifically. The interventions were multi-component bundles involving nurses, midwives, community health workers, education, training, referral systems and facility changes, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. Risk of bias was not uniformly low: three studies were low risk, three moderate and two high. Definitions and measurement of outcomes varied across studies, limiting direct comparability. Some included studies had methodological concerns such as lack of blinding or unclear allocation methods. Publication bias could not be reliably assessed because only three studies were included in the meta-analysis. The review included only English-language studies and excluded studies that did not report maternal mortality or predefined secondary outcomes.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that nurse-led care reduces maternal mortality. The primary outcome was not meta-analysed, and the strongest mortality-related result was a composite that also included severe postpartum hemorrhage and laparotomy, so maternal death alone was not isolated.

Read it on PubMed →