Effectiveness of DVD vs. group-initiated diabetes prevention on information uptake for high & low health literacy participants.
Cody Goessl, Paul Estabrooks, Wen You and 3 others
PMID 30665731WHAT IT FOUND
Overall, after a teach-back call, the DVD-based program with interactive voice response follow-up had better diabetes prevention comprehension than the class-based program with interactive voice response follow-up, but not for people with low health literacy.
Key findings
01After the teach-back call, the DVD group with interactive voice response follow-up had higher comprehension scores than the class group with interactive voice response follow-up: reverse score 15.4 vs 14.8, teach-back rounds 1.9 vs 2.1, and round 1 correct 4.2 vs 3.4.
02For high health literacy participants, the DVD group with interactive voice response follow-up had superior comprehension across all outcomes.
03For low health literacy participants, the DVD group with interactive voice response follow-up and the class group with interactive voice response follow-up did not differ significantly, and 18% of DVD low health literacy participants and 16% of class low health literacy participants did not achieve teach-to-goal after the final round.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study measured immediate comprehension on a teach-back call, not weight loss, physical activity, glucose control, or diabetes onset. Participants were analysed by intervention received or chosen, not by original random assignment, so selection may have affected group differences. The DVD and class groups differed in age, and the low health literacy group was older and more likely African-American, so baseline differences may affect interpretation. The authors note that in-person class implementation fidelity may have varied. Only 442 of 481 eligible participants completed the teach-back call.
Declared interests
No author conflicts of interest declaration appears in the supplied text. The publication types list NIH extramural research support.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that the DVD alone improves diabetes prevention outcomes. Both groups received interactive voice response follow-up and teach-back calls, and the study measured immediate comprehension, not behavior change or diabetes risk. For participants with low health literacy, the DVD and class groups did not differ significantly.