Effective nurse-patient relationships in mental health care: A systematic review of interventions to improve the therapeutic alliance.
Samantha Hartley, Jessica Raphael, Karina Lovell and 1 others
PMID 31862531WHAT IT FOUND
No intervention is confirmed to improve the nurse-patient therapeutic alliance in mental health care.
Included studies were mostly weak, and effects were inconsistent.
Key findings
01Interventions targeting the therapeutic alliance included training, psychological formulation, reflective groups, consultation and shared activity, but none is confirmed effective.
02Four of the eight included studies found no statistically significant difference in assessed therapeutic alliance.
03Six of the eight studies were rated weak methodologically, and only one study met strong design criteria.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only eight studies were included, so the review cannot identify which intervention works best. Six of the eight studies were rated weak methodologically, with limited randomisation, blinding, confounder control and reporting of withdrawals. Four studies found no significant difference in alliance, and positive findings came from weak or moderate-quality designs. Most studies measured alliance with the Working Alliance Inventory, a therapy tool that may not fit nurse-patient key-worker relationships. Interventions were often group-based, while alliance is a dyadic relationship between one nurse and one patient. Few studies checked fidelity to the intervention, so null results may reflect poor implementation rather than ineffective content.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that psychological formulation, reflective groups or shared activity improve the nurse-patient alliance because some studies reported gains. The review found no intervention confirmed effective, and most studies were weak; positive findings came from small, under-controlled designs.