RNRCTInternational journal of nursing practice2024

Effect of web-based education intervention on blood glucose control, self-care and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Nurten Terkes, Hicran Bektas, Mustafa Kemal Balci

PMID 39155430

WHAT IT FOUND

The web-based diabetes education package did not improve fasting plasma glucose or HbA1c compared with routine follow-up.

Compared with routine follow-up, it improved self-care, self-efficacy, quality of life, BMI and waist circumference over 3 months.

Key findings

01There were no statistically significant between-group differences after 3 months in fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, systolic or diastolic blood pressure, direct LDL cholesterol or triglyceride levels.

02The intervention group's diabetes self-care, self-efficacy and quality-of-life scores increased, while the control group's scores decreased, with significant between-group differences.

03Body mass index and waist circumference changes differed significantly between the intervention and control groups.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The trial was conducted at one centre in Turkey, so the results may not apply to other health systems. Participants had to be literate, use insulin, have a computer or mobile device and internet access, and have no cognitive, physical or mental impairments, so the findings do not address people who cannot use such technology or have more complex conditions. Follow-up was only 3 months, so persistence of effects beyond that period is unknown. The intervention was a package with several components, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. Some participants did not attain the anticipated weekly website access, lost internet, withdrew or missed the post-test, which weakens confidence in real-world delivery. Participants were blinded to allocation and hypotheses, but the paper does not report blinding of outcome assessors or clinicians. The paper does not state a single primary outcome, so the relative importance of the metabolic, self-care and quality-of-life results is unclear. The authors' conclusion that blood glucose control improved is not supported by the between-group results for fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that this website improved blood glucose control compared with routine follow-up. The between-group differences for fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c were not statistically significant, and the study did not separate the effects of the website's access, forum, notifications and reminders.

Read it on PubMed →